Is having a single `IndexWriter` instance in Lucene a good idea?
Posted
by
Dragos
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by Dragos
Published on 2012-03-18T21:31:47Z
Indexed on
2012/03/19
23:38 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 224
search-engine
I am trying to understand how Lucene should be used.
From what I have read, creating an IndexReader
is costly, so using a Search Manager
shoulg be the right choice. However, a SearchManager
should be produced by a NRTManager
(which, by the way, should replace the IndexWriter
for every add or delete operation performed). But in order to have a NRTManager
, I should first have an IndexWriter
, and here comes my problem.
The documentation says:
- an IndexWriter is thread-safe
- the constructor of this class takes a
Directory
object, so it seems creating an instace should be costly(as in the case of an IndexReader) all changes are buffered and flushed periodically(so they seem to encourage using a single instance)
but:
the changes, although flushed will only be visible after
commit
orclose
- after finished making updates(add/delete), the instance should be closed
- I also found this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5374419/forgot-to-close-the-lucene-indexwriter-after-adding-documents-to-the-index where it is said that not closing a writer might ruin everything
So what am I really supposed to do? Is having a single IndexWriter
instance a good idea (make only commit
and never close
it)?
EDIT: What is more, if I use NRTManager, how can I make a
commit`? Is it even possible?
© Programmers or respective owner